Why would the killer go through the effort of thoroughly deleting one specific photo when they could have just taken out the batteries/SD-card and thrown the girls' equipment in the river? As you likely know, unless a photo has been deleted on a computer, any photos taken on a camera or a phone can be restored. But, there's one piece of evidence that wouldn't make sense in either scenario, and that's the titular deleted photograph. To be honest, in my opinion, both sides have very valid points of equal merit. I tried to be as unbiased as possible in consideration of the two most popular theories whether it was a murder or an accident. I've been engulfed with this mystery more than what's probably healthy, and I've read tons of threads discussing what might have happened to Kremers and Froon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |